But certainly the charges by Dolores Huerta, Ana Murguia and Debra Rojas deserve to be taken seriously, as well. It's also the case that claims of such crimes that emerge decades later are more difficult to evaluate than ones formally investigated immediately after the event. Murguia and Rojas were minors at the time they report the abuse began. (1)
It’s worth remembering that Chavez teamed up in the late 1970s with the authoritarian Synanon cult headed by Charles Dederich, which was known for encouraging psychological and physical abuse. Not that it diminishes Chavez’ responsibility for his own actions, but it would be interesting to know if the claimed sexual assaults occurred before or after Chavez teamed up with the Synanon cult.
Chavez’ association with Synanon doesn’t seem to have been often mentioned in the years since his passing, although it became well known at the time. Jeffrey Rubin reports on an experience he had in 1978 as a teacher who held English classes for the UFW. What he describes took place around 1978, when the Synanon effects had become very evident. He describes an incident at a graduation ceremony for students successfully complete their courses. Note that Huerta was also part of this process:
At the end of the show, photos of Cesar Chavez, [the union headquarters] La Paz, and a farm worker in the fields came onscreen with a voiceover saying, “The Union is not Cesar Chavez, the Union is not La Paz, the Union is the farmworkers.”Rubin also describes some of the qualities of Chavez’ union work that did achieve real successes at the time. He also gives a glimpse of the Catholic version of nonviolent action that Chavez’ and his movement practiced. And he also writes some about how that large vision of a social movement may have eventually detracted Chavez from the essentials of union-building:
In the bright sun, families strolled from the school building to the dining room, congratulating the graduates and helping themselves heartily to the cafeteria-style buffet. Soon after lunch began, however, Huerta stood up to denounce an act of treason. “There are traitors here who want to destroy Cesar,” she said with characteristic fierceness. These covert enemies, Huerta explained, had inserted the words “The Union is not Cesar Chavez” in the slideshow as part of an effort to usurp the leader’s authority, and they needed to be named and expelled from the movement.
Huerta demanded that the teachers identify the authors of the subversive phrase. The teacher of the advanced class refused, as did the rest of us. The meal ended quickly and awkwardly, the families dispersed, and the teachers from all three classes were ushered to a small table in a backroom office. Confronted there by Huerta, Richard Chavez, and Cesar Chavez himself, we were accused of being part of a subversive plot, railed at, called “chicken shit” by Cesar, and thrown out of La Paz and the union. (2) [my emphasis]
From the first strikes, Chavez infused the UFW with a religious sense of mission, embodied in his fasts and in visions of a self-sustaining, quasi-religious order to nurture the movement at its core and expand the struggle. As soon as the early grape contracts were signed, Chavez began to speak of a Poor People’s Union and farm worker cooperatives ...So far as I’m aware, Chavez never used his position as a movement leader for personal financial gain. His notion of a Catholic poor people’s non-violent revolution obviously eventually led him to practice abusive behavior in his role as a union and movement leader. But running financial scams does not seem to have been one of his failings.
I would highly recommend the book Why David Sometimes Wins: Strategy, Leadership, and the California Agricultural Movement (2099) by Marshall Ganz, a veteran of the civil rights movement who was a longtime senior organizer for the UFW and its political efforts. In 2008 headed the Obama campaign’s grassroots mobilization group that applied Ganz’ community-organizing methods. Unfortunately for the health of the Democratic Party, Obama after his election folded that group’s function into the Democratic Party organization – which of course dumped the community-organizing model right away.
It’s also worth noting that Cesar Chavez was training as a community organizer by Fred Ross in Chicago, who had been himself trained by Saul Alinsky. The Republicans used this as one of their favorite insults against Obama, using the idea that Obama was an “Alinskyist” organizer as a synonym for leftwing black Communist Kenyan Muslim. There’s a real irony there, because the “Alinsky” style of community organizing, which Alinsky described in his 1945 book Reveille for Radicals.
The accusation that Alinsky-type organizing represented some kind of crackpot left radicalism is ironic, because Alinsky himself promoted a non-ideological brand of community organizing through house meetings, protests, fundraisers, and door-to-door recruiting. It focused heavily on scoring small but visible wins – getting a park renovated or traffic lights installed, improving the sewage system, clearing out some community eyesore, organizing neighborhood watches, getting streets repaired, demanding actions against landords who don’t keep their building properly repaired, and so on.
It’s obvious why such organizing techniques could be attractive for left-leaning causes. If you were promoting a campaign for No Taxes On Billionaires, for instance, you would hold a million-dollar-per-plate dinner at Mar-a-Lago or sponsor a Toby Keith concert at the Davos Economic Forum, or something similar. You wouldn’t be organizing house meetings in working class neighborhoods.
But left-leaning critics did criticize the Alinsky style for not emphasizing larger social issues like the maldistribution of wealth. Foreign policy issues, health insurance, public school funding, emergency preparedness are all issues that require action by Congress or state legislatures. And effectiveness on that level means having political parties that can gain representation in state and federal governments. And that requires a wider political ideology and/or partisan identity than demanding better street-cleaning service from city hall.
Cesar Chavez had a much broader ideological vision of a poor people’s movement. That he wound up obsessed with wielding his personal authority and allegedly acting in a sexually abusive way not a matter of political ideology as such but of personal failings. But he was neither the first nor the last to use his personal position and charisma for unworthy purposes.
Ganz in a 2009 paper also analyzed the experience of organizers in the 2008 Obama campaign, drawing this distinction which reminds us that techniquest of community organizing can be adapted to larger and more ideological causes than the Alinsky vision represented:
Unlike political "marketers" who sell causes, candidates, or commodities by appealing to the preferences of their customers; unlike philanthropic "providers" who dispense services to needy clients; and unlike social ―entrepreneurs‖ who devise technical solutions to challenging public problems; organizers identify, recruit and develop leaders who can mobilize constituents to - stand together‖ to learn, collaborate, and act on behalf of common purposes. (3)
Notes:
(1) Brangham, William et al (2026): Investigation uncovers sexual abuse allegations against Cesar Chavez. PBS Newshour 03/18/2026. (Accessed: 2026-01-04). <https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/investigation-uncovers-sexual-abuse-allegations-against-cesar-chavez>
Saad, Nardine (2026): US civil rights leader Cesar Chavez accused of sexual abuse. BBC News 03/19/2026. <https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp8r8rggxmmo> (Accessed: 2026-01-04
Rainey, James (2026): A cult of personality around Cesar Chavez shatters with sexual assault allegations. Los Angeles Times 03/19/2026. <https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2026-03-19/essential-california-cesar-chavez-sexual-assault-long-secret> (Accessed: 2026-01-04).
(2) Rubin, Jeffrey (2010): Shattered Dreams. Dissent Spring 2010. 91-95. <https://dissentmagazine.org/article/shattered-dreams/>
(3) Ganz, Marshall (2009): Organizing Obama: Campaign, Organizing, Movement. Harvard Kennedy School Aug 2009. <http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:27306258> (Accessed: 2026-01-04).
No comments:
Post a Comment