PayGo is just the ultimate in Democratic politics -- an utterly unnecessary bit of infighting caused by an utterly unnecessary self-punishment caused by an utterly unnecessary sense of defensiveness & self-loathing, all in a futile attempt to impress ... who exactly?— David Roberts (@drvox) January 3, 2019
The Democrats just passed new House rules including the notorious PayGo rule, which is what David Roberts there characterized it to be in that tweet. (Lindsey McPherson, House adopts rules package with few Democratic defections over PAYGO provision Roll Call 01/03/2019)
Even though almost all House Democrats voted for the rules including PayGo, the Dems‘ obsession with the deficit is a political ball-and-chain they‘ve put on themselves. The ”Simpson-Bowles“ mentality by the Dems was a big factor that opened the way to having the Orange Clown in the White House. Barack Obama repeatedly tried to cut Social Security and Medicare in his ”Grand Bargain.“ Even though today‘s Republican leaders would gladly do away with both, they successfully used that in campaigning against Dems, including in 2010.
The Reps‘ strategy was dishonest but politically shrewd. They blasted projected savings in Medicare from Obamacare/ACA as cuts to Medicare. The Democrats were hamstringed in responding because Obama was pushing for cuts in Medicare. It‘s hard for the Democrats to ridicule Republican hypocrisy on the deficits. Because Republican cynicism on the issue is beyond hypocrisy. They really, really don‘t care about deficits. They only pretend to when they push for ”entitlement reform.“
Sarah Kliff gave an explanation of this during the 2012 Presidential campaign in Romney’s right: Obamacare cuts Medicare by $716 billion. Here’s how. Washington Post 08/14/2018. As the headline indicates, this WaPo presentation was going out of its way to give credit to Both Sides. But she does tell the story correctly. The "cuts" to Medicare were savings, the biggest part of which came from fixing a well-known and much-discussed problem with Medicare Advantage.
And Medicare savings were realized without reducing services: Obamacare program generates 'substantial' Medicare savings CNBC 05/04/2015; Bruce Japsen, Hillary's Right: Obamacare Reduces Medicare Spending Forbes 10/23/2016.
The Democrats should have been able to make this case more straightforwardly. That's too mild. It should have been a slam-dunk. But they would have to give up the neoliberal obsession with deficits and especially the Simpson-Bowles be-all-end-all of cutting Social Security and Medicare.
There is actually a very good case that economists like Jamie Galbraith make that in the post-Bretton Woods world, the US deficit really doesn‘t matter for the foreseeable future. But the Democrats won‘t be able to make even a mild version of that case until they flush the Simpson-Bowles mentality out of their political calculations.
No comments:
Post a Comment