The existence and nature of the Azov Battalion is one set of data in a much larger and very complicated confrontation between Russia and Ukraine. But it is obviously a problem from NATO's point of view in this situation.
See also: Congress bans arms to Ukraine militia linked to neo-Nazis The Hill 03/27/2018:
“White supremacy and neo-Nazism are unacceptable and have no place in our world,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), an outspoken critic of providing lethal aid to Ukraine, said in a statement to The Hill on Tuesday. “I am very pleased that the recently passed omnibus prevents the U.S. from providing arms and training assistance to the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion fighting in Ukraine.”Ben Makuch reports, "Some American neo-Nazi extremist groups see Azov as a future model for themselves in the U.S. once their fantasy race war takes place and the federal government collapses." (Ex-US Soldier Turned Influencer Criticized for Ukraine War Trip With Neo-Nazi Vice 05/14/2021)
The United States has been aiding and training Ukrainian forces in their fight against Russian-backed separatists since 2014, and recently expanded that aid to include arms. The omnibus includes about $620.7 million in aid for Ukraine, including $420.7 million in State Department and foreign operations funds and $200 million in Pentagon funds.
The Azov Battalion was founded in 2014, and its first commander was Andriy Biletsky, who previously headed the neo-Nazi group Patriot of Ukraine. Several members of the militia, which has been integrated into the Ukrainian National Guard, are self-avowed neo-Nazis.
So, if you hear about the group in polemics over Ukraine, its existence isn't a propaganda construction. But as always, claims over military confrontations always need to be subjected to critical scrutiny.
No comments:
Post a Comment